Start Learning Free

Before You Begin

Question #46032

Difficulty: 8/10 | 🟢 Free

The Question

An ecologist monitors a highly productive monoculture crop field and notes that its 'standing crop' is exceptionally high. Applying Paul Ehrlich’s Rivet Popper hypothesis and David Tilman’s long-term ecosystem experiments, which of the following statements regarding this ecosystem is INCORRECT?

Options

  • A.

    Because the standing crop is exceptionally high, the ecosystem demonstrates maximum functional redundancy and minimal year-to-year variation in total biomass.

  • B.

    The ecosystem lacks functional redundancy, meaning the loss of even a few remaining species could trigger a disproportionately rapid ecological collapse.

  • C.

    The current high biomass masks an underlying vulnerability, as low-diversity systems inherently exhibit greater year-to-year variation in productivity.

  • D.

    The ecosystem's high productivity is uncoupled from complex food web interactions, making it analogous to an airplane heavily depleted of its structural rivets.

Check Your Answer

Correct Answer

Step-by-Step Solution

Explanation

How the Examiner Thinks

Evolutionary_Exception

Tackle problems where standard rules evolve or change based on specific environmental constraints.

Concepts Behind This Question

Primary Succession Facilitation|Hydrarch vs Xerarch Convergence

Why This Question Is Tricky

Common Mistakes

Conceptual Pivot: Conflating 'Standing Crop/Productivity' with 'Ecosystem Stability'.

Students often fall for the 'Quantitative Nuance' trap, assuming that a massive amount of biomass (high standing crop) automatically implies a healthy, stable, and resilient ecosystem.

They fail to integrate Chapter 14 (Ecosystem) with Chapter 15 (Biodiversity), specifically missing Tilman's finding that stability is a function of species richness (functional redundancy), not just raw biomass.

Quick Facts About This Question

Question Information

SubjectBiology
ChapterEcosystem - Class 12
ConceptStanding Crop quantification
Difficulty8
Cognitive Load5
Target Solve Time120 sec
AccessFree