Start Learning Free

Before You Begin

Question #46028

Difficulty: 8/10 | 🟢 Free

The Question

In a highly diverse forest ecosystem, a selective chemical agent eradicates a specific group of soil microarthropods and fungi. Over time, despite the continuous presence of a vast number of plant and herbivore species, the ecosystem's primary productivity crashes and severe nutrient immobility sets in. According to Paul Ehrlich’s Rivet Popper Hypothesis and principles of ecosystem functioning, how should this eradicated group be classified, and what is the primary cause of the ecosystem's collapse?

Options

  • A.

    They are 'seat rivets'; the collapse is due to the disruption of the grazing food chain (GFC) which indirectly halts the detritus food chain (DFC).

  • B.

    They are 'wing rivets'; the collapse is due to the loss of functional diversity, resulting in a biogeochemical bottleneck and failure of nutrient turnover.

  • C.

    They are 'seat rivets'; the collapse is due to a decrease in overall species richness, which directly reduces the ecosystem's resilience to alien species invasions.

  • D.

    They are 'wing rivets'; the collapse is due to a sudden increase in the standing crop of producers, which rapidly depletes the standing state of the ecosystem.

Check Your Answer

Correct Answer

Step-by-Step Solution

Explanation

How the Examiner Thinks

Evolutionary_Exception

Tackle problems where standard rules evolve or change based on specific environmental constraints.

Concepts Behind This Question

Diversity-Stability Relationship|Rivet Popper Hypothesis|Nutrient Immobility

Why This Question Is Tricky

Common Mistakes

Conceptual Pivot: Students often memorize the Rivet Popper Hypothesis merely as 'loss of species = ecosystem decline' without connecting it to specific functional groups (like decomposers) and biogeochemical cycling.

The trap lies in assuming that high species richness (producers/consumers) alone guarantees stability.

This question forces the synthesis of Chapter 15 (Biodiversity - Rivet Popper) with Chapter 14 (Ecosystem - Decomposition and Nutrient Cycling), proving that ecosystem stability is fundamentally contingent on chemical cycling rather than just taxonomic richness.

Quick Facts About This Question

Question Information

SubjectBiology
ChapterEcosystem - Class 12
ConceptNutrient Immobility
Difficulty8
Cognitive Load5
Target Solve Time120 sec
AccessFree