Start Learning Free

Before You Begin

Question #45045

Difficulty: 8/10 | 🟢 Free

The Question

Consider the following transformations of iron pentacarbonyl (\ceFe(CO)5\ce{Fe(CO)5}), a trigonal bipyramidal (d8d^8) complex:

Reaction I: \ceFe(CO)5+PPh3−>[Δ][Fe(CO)4(PPh3)]\ce{Fe(CO)5 + PPh3 ->[\Delta] [Fe(CO)4(PPh3)]} (Complex A) + \ceCO\ce{CO} Reaction II: \ceFe(CO)5+2Na(Hg)−>[THF]Na2[Fe(CO)4]\ce{Fe(CO)5 + 2Na(Hg) ->[\text{THF}] Na2[Fe(CO)4]} (Complex B) + \ceCO\ce{CO}

Which of the following statements correctly identifies the structural geometries, the dominant electronic effects dictating these geometries, and the relative C-O IR stretching frequencies (νCO\nu_{CO}) of Complexes A and B?

Options

  • A.

    In A, \ce{PPh3} is axial because equatorial positions offer superior π\pi-back-bonding for CO; B is tetrahedral (sp3sp^3) with a lower νCO\nu_{CO} than A due to enhanced synergic donation from the d10d^{10} center.

  • B.

    In A, \ce{PPh3} is equatorial to minimize steric repulsion (VSEPR); B is square planar (dsp2dsp^2) to satisfy the EAN rule, with a higher νCO\nu_{CO} than A due to the strong field nature of CO.

  • C.

    In A, \ce{PPh3} is axial because it is a strong π\pi-acceptor; B is tetrahedral (sp3sp^3) but exhibits a higher νCO\nu_{CO} than A because the −2-2 charge contracts the metal dd-orbitals, reducing back-bonding.

  • D.

    In A, \ce{PPh3} is equatorial because axial positions provide superior π\pi-back-bonding for CO; B is square planar (dsp2dsp^2) due to Jahn-Teller distortion of the d10d^{10} center, with a lower νCO\nu_{CO} than A.

Check Your Answer

Correct Answer

Step-by-Step Solution

Explanation

How the Examiner Thinks

Exception_Exposure

Learn to identify edge cases and boundary exceptions that JEE examiners hide in math problems.

Concepts Behind This Question

Hybridization and Geometry|Synergic Bonding in Carbonyls|EAN Rule (Sidgwick's Rule)

Why This Question Is Tricky

Common Mistakes

This problem weaponizes the conflict between VSEPR theory and Molecular Orbital Theory (Synergic Bonding), alongside a classic hybridization trap.

Students often blindly apply VSEPR, placing bulky ligands like \cePPh3\ce{PPh3} in the equatorial position of a TBP complex to minimize steric hindrance.

The hidden variable is that synergic π\pi-back-bonding is thermodynamically dominant; equatorial positions offer superior π\pi-overlap, reserving them for strong π\pi-acceptors like CO.

Furthermore, students associate strong-field CO ligands with dsp2dsp^2 square planar geometries, forgetting that a d10d^{10} center (\ceFe−II\ce{Fe^{-II}}) lacks empty dd-orbitals, forcing an sp3sp^3 tetrahedral geometry.

Quick Facts About This Question

Question Information

SubjectChemistry
ChapterOrganic Chemistry – Some Basic Principles and Techniques - Class 11 Part 2
ConceptHybridization and Geometry
Difficulty8
Cognitive Load7
Target Solve Time160 sec
AccessFree