Before You Begin
Question #44601
The Question
Consider the tetrahedral coordination complexes (Complex X) and (Complex Y) at 298 K. Determine the Effective Atomic Number (EAN), the number of unpaired electrons (), and the Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE) for Complex X and Complex Y, respectively.
(Format: X: (EAN, , CFSE) ; Y: (EAN, , CFSE))
Options
- A.
X: (33, 3, ) ; Y: (36, 0, 0)
- B.
X: (33, 3, ) ; Y: (36, 0, )
- C.
X: (35, 1, ) ; Y: (34, 2, )
- D.
X: (36, 0, 0) ; Y: (36, 0, )
Check Your Answer
Correct Answer
Step-by-Step Solution
Explanation
How the Examiner Thinks
Mechanism_Trap
Don't get tricked by the process! Learn the mechanical traps used in competitive exam questions.
Concepts Behind This Question
EAN Rule (Sidgwick's Rule)|Tetrahedral Splitting Patterns|Crystal Field Splitting (Octahedral)
Why This Question Is Tricky
Common Mistakes
The question tests the intersection of the EAN rule, Crystal Field Theory (CFT), and spin-pairing energy in tetrahedral complexes.
A primary trap is the misapplication of octahedral CFSE formulas to tetrahedral geometries.
For instance, students might calculate a CFSE of for a system by using the octahedral high-spin formula ().
Another critical trap is the 'Strong Field Ligand Illusion': students assume that because CO is a strong-field ligand, must have a large negative CFSE (like ), completely overlooking that Fe(-II) is a system where CFSE is mathematically zero regardless of ligand strength.
Finally, it highlights that stable complexes like can violate the EAN rule while being thermodynamically favored due to their high-spin CFSE stabilization.
Quick Facts About This Question
Question Information
| Subject | Chemistry |
| Chapter | Coordination Compounds - Class 12 |
| Concept | EAN Rule (Sidgwick's Rule) |
| Difficulty | 8 |
| Cognitive Load | 7 |
| Target Solve Time | 160 sec |
| Access | Free |