Before You Begin
Question #44400
The Question
An organic chemist aims to synthesize the diaryl ether 1-methoxy-4-(4-nitrophenoxy)benzene (Compound ) and the benzyl aryl ether 1-fluoro-4-((4-nitrophenoxy)methyl)benzene (Compound ).
The following synthetic pathways are evaluated: \textbf{Path I:} \ce{1-chloro-4-methoxybenzene} + sodium 4-nitrophenoxide \textbf{Path II:} \ce{1-chloro-4-nitrobenzene} + sodium 4-methoxyphenoxide \textbf{Path III:} \ce{1-(chloromethyl)-4-fluorobenzene} + sodium 4-nitrophenoxide
Which of the following statements correctly identifies the successful pathways and their corresponding mechanisms?
Options
- A.
Path II yields via an addition-elimination () mechanism involving a Meisenheimer complex, and Path III yields via an mechanism at the benzylic carbon. Path I fails due to the absence of a strong electron-withdrawing group.
- B.
Path I yields via an mechanism, and Path III yields via an mechanism at the fluorinated carbon. Path II fails due to the deactivating effect of the methoxy group on the nucleophile.
- C.
Both Path I and Path II yield via a benzyne intermediate, while Path III yields via an mechanism due to the stability of the 4-fluorobenzyl cation.
- D.
Path II yields via an mechanism on the aromatic ring, and Path III yields via an mechanism. Path I fails due to steric hindrance.
Check Your Answer
Correct Answer
Step-by-Step Solution
Explanation
How the Examiner Thinks
Exception_Exposure
Learn to identify edge cases and boundary exceptions that JEE examiners hide in math problems.
Concepts Behind This Question
Williamson Ether Synthesis Constraints|Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution (SNAr)
Why This Question Is Tricky
Common Mistakes
This question tests the mechanistic boundaries between Williamson Ether Synthesis () and Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution ().
A common student trap is assuming that any alkoxide/phenoxide will react with any organohalide to form an ether.
The problem highlights that is strictly forbidden on hybridized aromatic carbons.
It requires students to recognize that necessitates specific electronic activation (a strong EWG like at the ortho or para position) to stabilize the intermediate Meisenheimer complex.
Furthermore, Path III introduces a chemoselectivity trap, requiring the realization that an unactivated aryl halide will not undergo , whereas a benzylic halide will rapidly undergo under mild conditions.
Quick Facts About This Question
Question Information
| Subject | Chemistry |
| Chapter | Alcohols, Phenols, and Ethers - Class 12 |
| Concept | Williamson Ether Synthesis Constraints |
| Difficulty | 8 |
| Cognitive Load | 7 |
| Target Solve Time | 160 sec |
| Access | Free |