Start Learning Free

Before You Begin

Question #44333

Difficulty: 8/10 | 🟢 Free

The Question

Consider the following statements regarding the structural, electronic, and hybridization properties of Group 15 hydrides and fluorides at 298 K298\text{ K}:

I. The \ceF−N−F\ce{F-N-F} bond angle in \ceNF3\ce{NF3} (102.5∘102.5^\circ) is smaller than the \ceH−N−H\ce{H-N-H} bond angle in \ceNH3\ce{NH3} (107.2∘107.2^\circ) in accordance with Bent's rule. II. The \ceF−P−F\ce{F-P-F} bond angle in \cePF3\ce{PF3} is smaller than the \ceH−P−H\ce{H-P-H} bond angle in \cePH3\ce{PH3} because the highly electronegative fluorine atoms demand more p-character in the \ceP−F\ce{P-F} bonds. III. The hybridization of the central atom is restored in \cePF3\ce{PF3} compared to \cePH3\ce{PH3} because the highly electronegative fluorine atoms increase the effective nuclear charge (ZeffZ_{eff}) on phosphorus, which significantly reduces the 3s-3p energy gap. IV. The fractional s-character of the lone pair in \cePH3\ce{PH3} is greater than 80%80\%, which is significantly higher than the s-character of the lone pair in \cePF3\ce{PF3}. V. The Lewis basicity of \cePH3\ce{PH3} is greater than that of \ceNH3\ce{NH3} due to the lower electronegativity and larger polarizability of phosphorus.

Which of the following combinations of statements is CORRECT?

Options

  • A.

    I, III, and IV

  • B.

    I, II, and IV

  • C.

    II, III, and V

  • D.

    I, III, and V

Check Your Answer

Correct Answer

Step-by-Step Solution

Explanation

How the Examiner Thinks

Mechanism_Trap

Don't get tricked by the process! Learn the mechanical traps used in competitive exam questions.

Concepts Behind This Question

Screening Effect in Inner Shells|Bent's Rule|Hybridization in Non-Standard Cases

Why This Question Is Tricky

Common Mistakes

The question tests the limits of Bent's Rule and Drago's Rule by introducing the 'Screening Effect' and effective nuclear charge (ZeffZ_{eff}) as hidden variables.

Students often blindly apply Bent's Rule to predict that highly electronegative substituents always reduce bond angles (as seen in \ceNH3\ce{NH3} vs \ceNF3\ce{NF3}).

However, comparing \cePH3\ce{PH3} and \cePF3\ce{PF3} reveals a chemical exception: \cePH3\ce{PH3} is unhybridized due to a large 3s-3p energy gap (Drago's Rule), while the electronegative fluorines in \cePF3\ce{PF3} increase ZeffZ_{eff} on phosphorus, lowering the 3p orbital energy, reducing the gap, and restoring hybridization.

This makes the bond angle in \cePF3\ce{PF3} larger than in \cePH3\ce{PH3}, trapping students who ignore the orbital energy modulation caused by substituent electronegativity.

Quick Facts About This Question

Question Information

SubjectChemistry
ChapterClassification of Elements and Periodicity in Properties - Class 11 Part 1
ConceptScreening Effect in Inner Shells
Difficulty8
Cognitive Load7
Target Solve Time160 sec
AccessFree