Start Learning Free

Before You Begin

Question #44180

Difficulty: 8/10 | 🟢 Free

The Question

The Born-Haber cycle for a hypothetical alkaline earth metal halide \ceMX2(s)\ce{MX2(s)} involves the following thermodynamic parameters (in kJ mol−1\text{kJ mol}^{-1}): Standard enthalpy of formation (ΔHf∘\Delta H_f^\circ) = −795-795 Enthalpy of sublimation of \ceM(s)\ce{M(s)} = 155155 Sum of first and second ionization enthalpies of \ceM(g)\ce{M(g)} = 21802180 Bond dissociation enthalpy of \ceX2(g)\ce{X2(g)} = 240240 Electron gain enthalpy of \ceX(g)\ce{X(g)} = −340-340

A 1.0 molal1.0 \text{ molal} aqueous solution of \ceMX2\ce{MX2} is prepared. In concentrated solutions, \ceMX2\ce{MX2} deviates from ideal colligative behavior due to partial ion-pairing according to the equilibrium: \ceM2+(aq)+X−(aq)⇌MX+(aq)\ce{M^{2+}(aq) + X^{-}(aq) \rightleftharpoons MX^{+}(aq)} The ion-pair formation constant KcK_c is 2.4 kg mol−12.4 \text{ kg mol}^{-1}.

Assuming ideal behavior of the individual dissolved species, determine the magnitude of the lattice enthalpy (ULU_L in kJ mol−1\text{kJ mol}^{-1}) of \ceMX2(s)\ce{MX2(s)} and the boiling point of the 1.0 m1.0 \text{ m} solution. (Given: KbK_b for water = 0.52 K kg mol−10.52 \text{ K kg mol}^{-1}, boiling point of pure water = 100.00∘C100.00^\circ\text{C})

Options

  • A.

    2690 kJ mol−1,101.17∘C2690 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}, 101.17^\circ\text{C}

  • B.

    2690 kJ mol−1,101.56∘C2690 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}, 101.56^\circ\text{C}

  • C.

    3030 kJ mol−1,101.17∘C3030 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}, 101.17^\circ\text{C}

  • D.

    2450 kJ mol−1,101.56∘C2450 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}, 101.56^\circ\text{C}

Check Your Answer

Correct Answer

Step-by-Step Solution

Explanation

How the Examiner Thinks

Numerical_Precision

Improve calculation stamina and avoid rounding errors in high-stakes competitive examinations.

Concepts Behind This Question

Lattice Energy Factors|Boiling Point Elevation (Solvent vs Solution)

Why This Question Is Tricky

Common Mistakes

This problem tests two distinct traps.

First, in the Born-Haber cycle, students frequently forget to multiply the electron gain enthalpy by the stoichiometric coefficient of the halide ion (2 for MX2), leading to an incorrect lattice energy of 3030 kJ/mol.

Second, in colligative properties, students rely on the ideal Van't Hoff factor (i=3 for MX2), ignoring that in concentrated solutions, strong electrostatic interactions lead to ion-pairing.

By calculating the equilibrium concentration of the ion pair MX+, the effective molality is reduced from 3.0 m to 2.25 m, demonstrating the physical origin of the deviation between the theoretical and observed Van't Hoff factor.

Quick Facts About This Question

Question Information

SubjectChemistry
ChapterChemical Bonding and Molecular Structure - Class 11 Part 1
ConceptLattice Energy Factors
Difficulty8
Cognitive Load7
Target Solve Time160 sec
AccessFree