Start Learning Free

Before You Begin

Question #41233

Difficulty: 8/10 | 🟢 Free

The Question

Let f(x)=∣x∣+x2f(x) = |x| + x^2 for x∈[−1,1]x \in [-1, 1]. Consider the matrix M(x)=(f′(x)221−11011)M(x) = \begin{pmatrix} f'(x) & 2 & 2 \\ 1 & -1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix} defined for all x∈(−1,1)∖{0}x \in (-1, 1) \setminus \{0\}. Let CC be the set of all c∈(−1,1)∖{0}c \in (-1, 1) \setminus \{0\} such that M(c)M(c) is a singular matrix. If CC is non-empty, let S=∑c∈CcS = \sum_{c \in C} c. If CC is empty, let S=10S = 10. Find the value of SS.

Options

  • A.

    0

  • B.

    10

  • C.

    12\frac{1}{2}

  • D.

    −12-\frac{1}{2}

Check Your Answer

Correct Answer

Step-by-Step Solution

Explanation

How the Examiner Thinks

Monster

Ultra-high difficulty questions designed to test your limit, stamina, and deep conceptual understanding.

Concepts Behind This Question

Singular vs Non-Singular Matrices|Rolle's Theorem Root Existence|Modulus Function Symmetry

Why This Question Is Tricky

Common Mistakes

This question tests the misapplication of Rolle's Theorem and domain constraints.

Advanced students often integrate the first row of M(x)M(x) to form a new determinant h(x)=4−2f(x)h(x) = 4 - 2f(x).

Since h(−1)=h(1)=0h(-1) = h(1) = 0, they falsely assume by Rolle's Theorem that a root cc exists where h′(c)=det⁡(M(c))=0h'(c) = \det(M(c)) = 0.

Assuming symmetry, they guess the sum of roots is 0.

Alternatively, if they expand the determinant directly, they find false roots x=±1/2x = \pm 1/2 and fail to check the domain constraints of the signum function, again arriving at a sum of 0.

The lethal trap is that f(x)f(x) is non-differentiable at x=0x=0 (a cusp), which completely invalidates Rolle's Theorem and leaves the set of singular points empty.

Quick Facts About This Question

Question Information

SubjectMathematics
ChapterMatrices - Class 12
ConceptSingular vs Non-Singular Matrices
Difficulty8
Cognitive Load7
Target Solve Time160 sec
AccessFree