Before You Begin
Question #41134
The Question
Let be defined by Let . Consider the composite functions and . Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the existence of local inverses for and in some neighborhood of (where is sufficiently small)?
Options
- A.
is invertible on , but is not.
- B.
is invertible on , but is not.
- C.
Both and are invertible on .
- D.
Neither nor is invertible on .
Check Your Answer
Correct Answer
Step-by-Step Solution
Explanation
How the Examiner Thinks
Specialist
Targeted practice for niche, high-difficulty concepts that frequently appear in JEE Advanced exams.
Concepts Behind This Question
Composition Non-Commutativity|Inverse Existence Criterion|The L'Hôpital's Rule Misuse
Why This Question Is Tricky
Common Mistakes
This question tests the misconception that a positive derivative at a single point () guarantees local monotonicity and invertibility.
Students are baited into using L'Hôpital's rule to evaluate via the limit of the derivative, which leads to a non-existent limit, causing them to falsely conclude is non-differentiable.
If they correctly find , they often incorrectly assume is invertible near .
Furthermore, the non-commutativity of composition is exploited: evaluates near the pathological point , inheriting its non-monotonicity, whereas evaluates near , where is smooth and strictly monotonic, making invertible.
Quick Facts About This Question
Question Information
| Subject | Mathematics |
| Chapter | Relations and Functions - Class 12 |
| Concept | Composition Non-Commutativity |
| Difficulty | 8 |
| Cognitive Load | 7 |
| Target Solve Time | 160 sec |
| Access | Free |